Supreme Court · 19 October 2010

Mutuwila Farms Ltd v Nortje (SCZ 28 of 2010) [2010] ZMSC 7 (19 October 2010)

A mareva injunction requires solid evidence of real risk of asset dissipation; speculative fears warrant setting it aside. Flynote Mareva injunction — pre-judgment freezing orders — requires solid evidence of real risk of asset dissipation; ordinary interlocutory injunction principles (adequacy of damages) subordinate; injunctions must be clear, limited to value of claim, and accompanied by undertakings and penal notice. Read full summary

Loading full judgment…