High Court · [2004] ZMHC 4 · 4 November 2004

Chrispin Mushiba v Administrator General (2002/HP/A.0061) [2004] ZMHC 4 (4 November 2004)

Conditional correspondence did not revive a time‑barred claim; prior leave required to sue after appointment of a provisional liquidator. Flynote Limitation of actions — acknowledgement of debt — conditional correspondence does not revive time‑barred claims; Companies Act s.281 — provisional liquidator — prior leave required to commence or proceed with actions against the company; Procedural duty — plaintiff must obtain leave before suing liquidated company. Read full summary

Loading full judgment…